A couple of mildly interesting articles appear today regarding she-who-will-not-be-named.
At the Townhall muck room one Bert Prelutsky, while dismissing the performance of S-w-w-n-b-n on a recent television show, neatly turns a phrase by penning, "In fact, if I’m lucky enough to get on Mr. Deutsch’s show, I think I just might suggest that Christians are unperfected Jews."
Not one to be caught up in an ethnic/religious brouhaha, he.
Meanwhile, over at Huffington Post, one finds a curious little anecdote. It seems S-w-w-n-b-n was seen dining, with some pleasure, at a West Hollywood [Dear Gentle Reader(s), West Hollywood is a new code word for--gasp!--GAY!!!] restaurant.
When approached, "the the painfully thin, emotive, long blond haired thing in a small black dress with nearly exposed bosoms" was reluctant to speak with the writer of the posting.
Here's an amusing quote: "She was a natural with the gay men who surrounded her. She enjoyed the fawning attention by her two not so masculine male escorts, clearly in her milieu.
I was therefore shocked that when we tried to engage her in conversation, she became embarrassed, turned away, nestling her head inside her long, blond hair, much as would an embarrassed school girl caught stealing the answers to an exam."
"Two not so masculine" men in attendance? Oh my.
So, Dear Gentle Reader(s), which is it? Coultergeist (as Keith Olberman is fond of saying) or Coulterfraud?
I think she's laughing all the way to the bank--sort of like Rev. Ike. But is she conning right wingers? Possible.
Trust, but verify.
Monday, October 29, 2007
Coultergeist or Coulterfraud?
Posted by Unknown at 6:24 AM
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
The courage of your conviction virtually demands your name, if we don't know you.