Here's an interesting opening para from a recent AP story out of Baghdad: A key aide says Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki's relations with Gen. David Petraeus are so poor the Iraqi leader may ask Washington to withdraw the overall U.S. commander from his Baghdad post.
(The story is by STEVEN R. HURST and QASSIM ABDUL-ZAHRA, Associated Press Writers, dated July 28, 2007, "Heat rises between Iraq PM and Petraeus." The link is to a dallasnews.com site.)
So, the man who is named by President bush tens of times a month as being the person who will give us the report in September is at odds with the Prime Minister of Iraq?
The PM is upset because the General is too comfy with Sunnis which tends to kill off Shias like the PM?
The PM doesn't like what our "decider" on the scene is doing/planning?
According to the story our Ambassador to Iraq, Ryan Crocker, admits to "sporty exchanges" between the two men.
Wow.
Before we allow the "report" in September to mire us in this unhappy mess, we should take time to insist that someone, somewhere, verify before place our trust in further involvement in this obvious sectarian strife in Iraq.
UPDATE
The Los Angeles Times reports that Petraeus dismissed as "ludicrous" a report that Maliki felt he could no longer work with the general.
The problem, according to the Times article, is with the conflicts between Sunni and Shia adversaries.
---We'll see whether the AP or the LAT has the correct version. In any event, Petraeus' credibility is in jeopardy.
Sphere: Related Content
No comments:
Post a Comment
The courage of your conviction virtually demands your name, if we don't know you.